Photography and the Language of Place

Image: Felicity Hammond, Unveiling the Facade (detail), C-type print, 2016.

Artist Felicity Hammond engages the relationship between photography and the city in her experimental practice, which sees photography used diversely as a means to create installations, sculptures and two-dimensional prints. Alongside her current solo exhibition at Space in Between, writer Douglas Murphy considers the meaning of the city in relation to Hammond’s work.


The city is often said to be a repository of memory. This applies in the individual sense, urban form considered as the source of the collection of sense impressions around which lives are built. Spaces are bound by walls, we respond to their appearance and their touch, and our experiences and interactions are draped around and across them, relying on them as scaffolding for recollection. But the statement also means that the buildings of a city play a role in archiving the collective memory of a culture – monuments, statues, and their application to the facades of buildings, all create a significant web of historical memory that is intended to help ground the population of a city in a project of collective meaning.


Felicity Hammond, Public Collection, Private Collection, Installation view, Space in Between, London

But the city is also oriented towards the future – new buildings are invariably built as responses to perceived future demands and requirements, whether economic or cultural, and construction is nearly always a prospective activity. And indeed there are entire fields within architecture that have come from attempts to provide glimpses of future social, technological and political structures: these are memories of latent worlds, poised to be brought into being, even if the course of history has long since bypassed their particular moment of opportunity. Construction sites have always been barricaded spaces – for safety and for protection – but in recent years the art of decorating the hoardings behind which a new building rises has reached a period of high-style. This medium, particularly in its residential form, presents memories of the future on a small scale, site by site, aspirational rather than revolutionary, but their methods and visions tell us a great deal about our world.


Felicity Hammond, Unveiling the Facade, C-type print, 2016.


Felicity Hammond, Capital Growth, C-type print, 2015.

Today, the stock photos of happy couples on their generic designer sofa, sharing a glass of wine on the balcony, or getting away from their stressful finance job in the gym, are still present, but they are part of an increasingly sophisticated tapestry of ambitions and deflections. The language of place-marketing uses memories of previous uses and occupations as a narrative device to give various forms of generic space a character, even as new buildings sweep away the communities and spaces that constituted that character – a quiet violence in the form of ‘local character’ and value realisation. The slickness of the communicative language, presenting images and rhetoric not of future owners and occupants but of an image of the city into which they are supposed to invest, presents an uncomfortable image of coming change, utilising character as part of a project of abstraction and commodification.


Felicity Hammond, Public Collection, Private Collection, Installation view, Space in Between, London


Felicity Hammond, Stone Effect (Marble), Concrete and inkjet print on acrylic, 2016

But it is entirely strange that we have reached a point where the computer generated images of architectural space emblazoned on the hoardings have become indistinguishable from its final appearance, where the perfect image of a future space not only works to concretise that future but almost seems to render the space itself unnecessary.

Douglas Murphy

Douglas Murphy is an architect, academic, journalist, and author. He studied at the Glasgow School of Art and the Royal College of Art, and is currently ‘architecture correspondent’ at Icon magazine.  He is the author of ‘Last Futures’ (Verso, 2016) and The Architecture of Failure (Zero, 2012) and has written for a wide range of publications on architecture, fine art and photography, including: Architectural review, The Guardian, RIBA journal, and Frieze magazine. He has taught and lectured at Oxford University, UCL, The Royal College of Art, The Architectural Association, ETH Zurich, Historical Materialism Conference, The London Art Fair and London Design Festival among others, and has appeared on BBC Radio and Frieze TV.

Felicity Hammond received a Masters degree from the Royal College of Art in 2014, and is currently undertaking a TECHNE funded PhD at Kingston University. She has been a finalist and nominee for numerous awards including: Foam Talent (2016), British Journal of Photography’s International Photography Award (winner – 2016), and Saatchi New Sensations (2014). Her work has been exhibited widely and most recently at Tate Modern in collaboration with Self Publish Be Happy, London 2016; Somerset House for Photo London with The Photographer’s Gallery, London 2016; and Saatchi Gallery, London 2015.

This essay and images are reproduced here with kind permission of the artist. For more information on the exhibition, visit Space in Between online.

One Comment

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s